tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5159292600757892728.post4567790000804673708..comments2023-10-18T07:53:21.794-07:00Comments on Superblog: Why are 3-D animated films not as 3-D as 3-D live action films?Supernighthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12810195424294842769noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5159292600757892728.post-82997768679705236012009-02-18T14:58:00.000-08:002009-02-18T14:58:00.000-08:00I had no idea that's why it wasn't as fun now. Why...I had no idea that's why it wasn't as fun now. Why are they bothering? They should do old school 3d or nothing!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5159292600757892728.post-30556348135883501702009-02-13T05:03:00.000-08:002009-02-13T05:03:00.000-08:00Ha Ha3D Rules but now that it's become easier for ...Ha Ha<BR/><BR/>3D Rules but now that it's become easier for them to turn a 2D film into a 3D one, the films aren't being made to utilise it so you just get a load of layers and eye strain. I haven't seen My Bloody Valentine but the horror film before that that used 3D had no reason whatsoever to use it.<BR/><BR/>Older films like Jaws 3D on the other hand were filmed both ways so that you see loads of silly foreground stuff that makes no sense in the non-3D version.<BR/><BR/>Me and Alyssa were trying to work out what would be the most ridiculous film at the moment and we came up with The Reader and Frost Nixon 3D.<BR/><BR/>JoeyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com